A Good Year In 2008
It is one of the most important pieces of diabetes legislation of the past decade: the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act. This new law, signed by President Bush on Sept. 25 to go into effect on the first of January, restores the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to its original intent to protect people with diabetes and other chronic medical conditions from discrimination. The law overturns numerous court decisions that had severely narrowed who the law covered.
"In interpreting the Americans with Disabilities Act, the courts have consistently chipped away at its clear intent, excluding millions of Americans from the law’s protections,” says House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD). “In multiple decisions, judges found that for people who are able to mitigate the effects of their condition—such as people with diabetes who can manage their diabetes with insulin, oral medication, and diet and exercise—are not disabled enough to be protected by the original Americans with Disabilities Act.”
This victory follows a long-fought battle, led in part by the American Diabetes Association, for the rights of people with disabilities, including chronic illnesses like diabetes. It’s the most significant piece of antidiscrimination legislation for people with diabetes since the original Americans with Disabilities Act was passed in 1990. But this important law was only the capstone to a year that saw several major legislative victories for people with diabetes.
One victory came with the extension of two National Insititutes of Health programs funding diabetes research, prevention, and education. In July, Congress voted to extend funding for the Special Diabetes Programs for Indians and the Special Statutory Funding Program for Type 1 Diabetes Research until September 2011.
“Native Americans in this country are more affected by diabetes than are any other ethnic group,” says U.S. Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND), who worked to extend the legislation. “The Special Diabetes Program for Indians has been effective in addressing their specific needs through research, prevention, and treatment programs. … I believe that we will be able to build on the program’s success to drastically lower the rate of diabetes in the Indian community.”
James Schlicht, executive vice president of government affairs and advocacy at ADA, calls the extension one of the largest legislative victories of the year for people with
Funding that Matters to You
The federal government spends millions of dollars on research into
diabetes each year. Two government agencies—the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and
Prevention—make it all happen. The NIH’s National Institute of Diabetes
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the CDC’s Department of Diabetes
Translation are the two largest agencies funding and communicating
diabetes research in the United States today. They also back treatment,
education, and prevention programs.
Every fiscal year, Congress passes a series of appropriations bills
that determine the amount of money federal agencies receive as part of
the annual budget. Since Congress was unable to reach an agreement
before recess, agencies like the NIH and CDC will continue to be funded
at the current levels until March 2009. When Congress reconvenes, it
will work on passing a bill that sets funding levels for 2009.
This year, the American Diabetes Association is calling for an
additional $20.8 million for the Division of Diabetes Translation at
the CDC—a 33 percent increase—in order to enable the expansion of
prevention and control programs in states receiving little assistance
now. ADA is also urging Congress to allocate an additional $112.6
million—a 6.6 percent increase—for diabetes treatment and research at
the NIH.
diabetes. “The extension … means an additional $600 million in federal funding for diabetes research, prevention, and treatment programs,” he explains.
Another new piece of federal legislation that will help protect people with diabetes is Michelle’s Law, named for Michelle Morse, who died of colon cancer at age 22, just months after graduating from college. While undergoing chemotherapy treatments, Morse maintained a full course load at school—despite doctors’ orders—simply so that she would remain covered by her family’s health insurance. Signed in October, Michelle’s Law aims to protect students who are seriously ill or injured—including those experiencing complications from diabetes—by allowing them to take up to a year off from school while still being covered under their families’ health insurance plans.
To learn more about ADA’s legal advocacy efforts: diabetes.org/advocacy
Still more strides were taken at the federal level. The Farm, Nutrition, and Bioenergy Act of 2007 that was passed into law in May extends agricultural programs and includes related initiatives like the Fresh Fruit
and Vegetable School Snack Program, which invests $350 million for healthier schools—an important step on the road to diabetes prevention.
Other recent legislation makes it easier for Medicare beneficiaries to take advantage of their initial “Welcome to Medicare” doctor visit. The legislation waives the deductible for that visit and extends the time frame in which patients can schedule it from 6 months to a full year. Finally, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, signed into law in May, prohibits both employers and insurers from discriminating against people with genetic markers for diseases like diabetes and cancer.
ADA also led the fight at the state level this year, pushing for healthier and safer schools, more treatment and prevention programs, more research, and better health care.
In Rhode Island, it was a matter of keeping kids safe at school (see “Relief in Rhode Island,” p. 76). In Massachusetts, the focus was on research. There, the Life Sciences Initiative beca
me law in June, effectively investing $1 billion in the life sciences sector supporting stem cell and other new research technologies that have positive implications for diabetes research. The law allocates funds to research facilities at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center and University of Massachusetts—Amherst, and will grant funds to other small companies and research institutions as well.
In Utah, the Board of Nursing enacted a rule in June enabling school nurses in the state to delegate insulin and glucagon administration to trained non-medical school staff. Schools in Iowa will also benefit from new legislation: the Healthy Kids Act, which sets nutrition standards for the food sold to students in schools and requires 30 minutes of physical activity per school day for students. In New Mexico, new legislation allocates an estimated additional $500,000 to the New Mexico Diabetes Prevention and Control Program. Meanwhile ADA continues to work on the state level to preserve diabetes coverage by fighting rollbacks that limit the scope of insurance coverage for people with diabetes. All in all, legal accomplishments this year may mean health care reform and more tools for people fighting diabetes next year and in years to come.
“People with diabetes still struggle with attaining adequate and affordable health insurance that covers their diabetes medications, supplies, and treatment,” says Schlicht. “With the issue of improving health care moving to center stage in 2009, ADA will continue to work with Congress and with other health organizations to fight for health reform that will address these problems.”
Relief in Rhode IslandChris Librizzi knows what a severe low blood glucose looks like. He’s seen it on calls he’s made as a firefighter and emergency medical technician, and he’s seen it at home, in his 10-year-old son Zachary. He also knows the importance of administering an emergency drug in these situations. That’s why he’s testified several times before Rhode Island state legislators about the significance of glucagon—a fast-acting injectable hormone that stimulates the liver to produce glucose—helping to pass a bill that will enable kids in Rhode Island’s schools to have better access to the drug. Glucagon is the emergency treatment recommended when someone with diabetes experiences a severe low. Zachary has been brought out of lows with glucagon three times by his parents at home. But school is a different story. Sometimes, no one in a particular school is comfortable enough to or authorized to administer glucagon, and a school nurse may not be readily available. It’s a harrowing thought— and it’s why the Rhode Island “Glucagon Bill,” passed in August, was designed to encourage trained personnel like teachers and other school staff to administer glucagon to kids in diabetes emergencies. “In some school districts you had to wait for emergency services to arrive before administering glucagon; a lot of schools don’t have a nurse on the premises,” Librizzi says. He added that there are many areas in Rhode Island that have few fire departments, resulting in a slower response time: “That could be up to 10 minutes in some communities.” And 10 minutes, Librizzi says, can make all the difference. “A child would absolutely suffer brain damage if they were in a hypoglycemic seizure,” he explains. “Every second counts.” |





Comments
Cost on medications
I need help paying for my medical insurance that is out of pocket and the cost of meds. I have had diabetes for 43 years and I am in good health but that doesn't help the fact that I am labeled "diabetic" so no life insurance, high health insurance and the cost of insulin is expensive. Is there help for us now? There will never be a cure for then the pharmacutical companies would be out of business we keep them going. Research is great but some of that money needs to help us somehow.
cost on medications
I'm a 50 year old female with type 2 diabetes, my husband is also diabetic.I have to work 2 jobs to just keep my head above water. As my husband lost his job it is now my responsibily to carry all the insurance.I know a-lot of stress is not good for people like us. I would love to be able to get some help.Don't get me wrong I'm blessed to be working. It hardens my heart to see others get either free or VERY low cost healthcare. While the rest of us sick or not pay for it. Pam Garland Tx.
Insurance
What we need to see is, sans Universal Healthcare, legislation that forbids insurance companies from denying coverage or charging higher rates for lesser plans for people with Diabetes and other long term illness. As a IT contractor, I don't always have access to adequate healthcare or if I do have access to it via the consulting company I am working through, I get charged high rates for the crappiest plan they have since ther is no corporate subsization. The other thing that needs serious improvement is the VA. That is my backup option. I find the care I have recieved via the VA has sucked completely. During the 6 months that I did take advantage of it, I never saw a doctor. The staff at the local clinic did thier best I am sure, but they just did not have the knowledge that a doctor has. They also do not have weekend hours. As a contractor, if I take off time to go to the doctor during the week, I don't get paid. Contractors generally do not have any sick time or personal time. I feel a bit left in the cold and end up going months without medication or access to a doctor.
Diabetes and Medical Assistance
I think that anyone that is not working or unable to obtain employment should be able to automatically receive medical assistance until they or spouse is able to obtain employment with health insurance that is affordable to the whole family not just the spouse that is working. In my husband's past job, the health insurance for him was only $17.48 per week but when he wanted to get it for both of us, it costs $184 a week. thats ridiculous!!! I was just diagnosed with Diabetes Type 2 on July 16th, 2008 and I was unable to get insurance through his employment cause it cost too much. I am hoping that employment insurance gets better so that a whole family can be afforded.
Thank You,
Susan Hatfield
teeth
Why dosent anyone in congress or senate care about the teeth of americans or of people with diabetes. I have had Diabetes for 11 yrs and have lost my molors and was told manley do to Diabetes , Why do we not have Dental care as part of coverage to medicare? Its preventative to serious infections that affect eyes and other parts of body including gangreen infections. Dentist do not help anyone unless you have cash and most people dont have cash or insurance. I had 2 seriouse infected teeth and could not find any help and no charitys would help . Lost all my molors and now i found a dentist 50 miles a way that works for differnt county and only charges 25.00 a visit and told me i will loose the rest because i am useing front teeth to chew , i need dentures but know one will let you make payments. We need a dental plan nation wide for all people young and old so we can Smile again. If Dentistry is medical then why do we not have coverage so we can eat properly, If its not then they should not be part of medical field, We need Preventitive Dental for all.
Thank You
William J Blacksmith Jr
the UNINSURED
We have 3 uninsured diabetics in my immediate family. How I wish that there was help for us. We could manage our health better if we could afford the proper medications but we have to "Use the cheapest" not necessarily the right medications for us. Where can we go for help. We live in the "LIVE FREE OR DIE" state of New Hampshire. The motto says it all, but I don't like the last option. HELP US if you can.
Donna
we must protect people with disabiltys
we must protect people with all disabiltys bipolor all mental illneses and diebeties .100% its about time we the people stand up to the legistators and senators and goverment and take a stand we must have the help that has been lacking for 8 terrible years and the conpassion and love for all
Good Job
Thanks
Diabetes discrimination against CDL truck drivers and others
We all know real people drive trucks to deliver goods we need and want to out neighborhood stores.
But do you know truck drivers are not allowed the same protection other diabetics have now?
They cannot use insulin ( In most cases) to control their sugar levels. This makes them lose all rights to make a honest living. Their licenses are revoked and they are no longer allowed to do their chosen profession.
If you have an otherwise protected problem with your life the government tries to protect you but with a CDL driver you are penalized and restricted. All of this is not even backed up by the medical records that are available.
Many of us who take early retirement are forced to by unfair rules enforced by our own government. This limits all people that are now being classified as second class citizens with this life changing problem.
Lets hope this new law will enter into this area.
Type 2 as it is now called and pushed upon us is a newly diagnosed problem when I was a kid it was called a pre- condition to needing treatment, involving drugs, this is now the largest growing medical problem most of us fack as we age as well as the largest growing pharmacy money maker for them, as doctors prescribe more and more drugs to combat it... What ever that is.
Lets all hope this is not a preview of what the medical progress (as they call it) is ahead for us.
Please be aware of this and other items the medical and programs that were put in place to help all our citizens do things better and now intrude to the point you are relegated to second class with no fault of thier own.
Thank You!
As a diabetic, I thank everyone at the ADA for your stance on the need for governmental research funding and the importance of stem cell research. I commend your efforts - my life's riding on it!
Bless you and thank you all,
Sue from Wisconsin
Post new comment